Per offrirti il miglior servizio possibile Dr. Schär Institute utilizza cookies di terzi. Continuando la navigazione nel sito autorizzi l’uso dei cookies. Sono d‘accordo

Piattaforma informativa per esperti sulla celiachia e sensibilità al glutine non celiaca.

Dr. Schär Institute
Menu

Sensibilità al glutine non celiaca o intestino irritabile?

Alcuni pazienti affetti da intestino irritabile rispondono a un’alimentazione senza glutine con un netto miglioramento dei sintomi. Una volta escluse celiachia e allergia al grano, l’introduzione sperimentale di un’alimentazione senza glutine permette di diagnosticare con buona probabilità una sensibilità al glutine non celiaca.
La correlazione tra sindrome dell’intestino irritabile (IBS) e celiachia è oggetto di studio ormai da molto tempo e appare ormai assodata. I pazienti affetti da una celiachia non diagnosticata possono presentare sintomi analoghi a quelli di una IBS. Il quadro clinico della sindrome dell’intestino irritabile, soprattutto del tipo diarrea dominante in alcun casi migliora con l’adozione di una dieta priva di glutine, anche in assenza di una correlazione diretta con la celiachia o l’allergia al grano. A sua volta, l’ingestione di glutine può scatenare una serie di disturbi a carico di stomaco e intestino. In questi casi sembra che pazienti affetti da sensibilità al glutine non celiaca e da IBS sensibile al glutine possano trarre beneficio da un’alimentazione priva di glutine.
 

Dosaggio degli anticorpi anti-gliadina IgG

Il test per gli anticorpi anti-gliadina IgG è in grado di fornire una delle prime conferme della presenza di una sensibilità al glutine non celiaca e dovrebbe pertanto rientrare nella procedura diagnostica. La concentrazione di anticorpi anti-gliadina nella popolazione generale si aggira intorno al 12 per cento e nei malati di IBS al 17 per cento circa (fonte: Sanders DS et al. 2001; Sanders DS et al. 2003). Per contro, si parte dal presupposto che nella metà circa dei pazienti affetti dai sintomi tipici della sensibilità al glutine non celiaca, la quantità di anticorpi anti-gliadina presente nel sangue sia più alta. Si ritiene che nei soggetti sensibili, una dieta contenente glutine scateni una reazione immunitaria della mucosa intestinale che provoca la produzione di anticorpi anti-gliadina. Per quale motivo solo i pazienti che soffrono di IBS con diarrea dominante e che sono risultati positivi al marker HLA-DQ2 associato alla celiachia beneficiano di un’alimentazione senza glutine è oggetto di un attuale lavoro di ricerca condotto dalla Charité di Berlino. Si tratterebbe di un importante biomarker diagnostico, perché i pazienti affetti da sensibilità al glutine non celiaca e non da IBS, reagiscono a un’alimentazione senza glutine con un netto miglioramento o con una scomparsa dei sintomi, riconquistando una buona qualità di vita. I primi risultati mostrano che il 34 per cento dei pazienti coinvolti nello studio hanno risposto positivamente a un’alimentazione senza glutine: in almeno il 75 per cento delle settimane che scandivano i quattro mesi di trattamento i sintomi sono scomparsi o si sono sensibilmente attenuati. Comunque sia non è stata dimostrata alcuna correlazione tra la sensibilità al glutine non celiaca e l’espressione di HLA-DQ2/8.

Potrebbe interessarvi anche…

Download 1

Mostra tutti

Presentazioni 5

Mostra tutti

Studi 3

Mostra tutti

Portale dei video 1

Mostra tutti

Opuscolo "La sensibilità al glutine non celiaca"

Questo opuscolo fornisce una panoramica sul glutine e sulla sensibilità al glutine, un argomento relativamente nuovo. Oltre alla definizione, alla sintomatologia, all'algoritmo diagnostico e al decorso vengono illustrate le diverse indicazioni terapeutiche e vengono presentati studi di casi pratici.

IBS & Gluten Sensitivity: The European experience (2013)

Antonio Carroccio
Direttore Medicina Interna presso ASP AG
Palermo, Italy

15th International Celiac Disease Symposium dal 22 al 25 settembre 2013 a Chicago

IBS & Gluten Sensitivity: The North American Experience (2013)

Ciarán P. Kelly, M.D.
Medical Director, Celiac Center
Beth Israel Deaconess
Professor of Medicine
Harvard Medical School
Boston MA, USA

15th International Celiac Disease Symposium dal 22 al 25 settembre 2013 a Chicago

Non-Coeliac Gluten Sensitivity and IBS: The UK experience (2013)

Dr. Peter Mooney
Clinical Research Fellow
Royal Hallamshire Hospital
Sheffield, UK

15th International Celiac Disease Symposium dal 22 al 25 settembre 2013 a Chicago

Gluten Sensitivity and the Nervous System: Autism and GS (2013)

Anna Sapone, M.D.
Mucosal Biology and Immunology Research Center and Center for Celiac Research
Massachusetts General Hospital for Children
Second University of Naples, Italy

15th International Celiac Disease Symposium dal 22 al 25 settembre 2013 a Chicago

Gluten Sensitivity and Schizophrenia (2013)

Deanna L. Kelly, Pharm. D., BCPP
Professor of Psychiatry
Director, Treatment Research Program
Maryland Psychiatric Research Center (MPRC)
University of Maryland
School of Medicine, USA

15th International Celiac Disease Symposium dal 22 al 25 settembre 2013 a Chicago

Non-celiac gluten sensitivity has narrowed the spectrum of irritable bowel syndrome: A double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a gluten free diet on gastrointestinal symptoms in a group of Iranian patients with IBS using a double-blind randomised, placebo-controlled trial design.

148 adult patients with IBS and fulfilling the Rome III criteria were initially recruited from a private gastroenterology clinic in Tehran. Patients excluded from the study included those with a diagnosis of coeliac disease or inflammatory bowel disease, those who were already following or had previously followed a wheat or gluten free diet, those using drugs for depression/ anxiety, those using non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and those with abnormal electrolytes levels or thyroid function tests. The resulting patient sample eligible to commence a gluten free diet was 102, of these 22 patients withdrew from the study on the basis that the diet was too difficult to follow. A further 8 patients found relief from a gluten free diet but decided to withdraw as they were unprepared to follow the diet strictly. The remaining 72 patients completed the study (19 males and 53 females). Patients were randomly assigned to the gluten group (35 patients; 6 males and 29 females; mean age 44.5 +/- 10 years) or the placebo group (37 patients; 13 males and 24 females; mean age 43.2 +/- 17 years). There was no statistical difference between the 2 groups in terms of IBS sub-type. Patients completed a visual analogue symptom questionnaire at baseline to investigate primary outcomes including bloating, abdominal pain, defecation satisfaction, nausea, fatigue, and overall symptoms. Serum markers were measured for IgA anti-tTG, IgA anti-gliadin and IgG anti-gliadin antibodies, HLA typing was also performed for all patients.  

All 72 patients then commenced a 6 week gluten free diet with weekly assessment by a dietitian to monitor and support compliance. After 6 weeks the gluten group were each asked to consume 100g/day (2 x 50g doses) of gluten powder (FODMAP free), the placebo group were asked to consume 100g/ day of gluten-free powder (rice flour, corn starch and glucose). Powders were mixed with warm water and consumed with breakfast and tea each day for a further 6 weeks. All patients remained on a gluten free diet for this second 6 week phase of the study.

After the 6 week challenge phase, symptoms were controlled in 25.7% of the gluten-containing group v’s 83.8% in the placebo group, indicating that 26 of the 35 patients in the gluten group became symptomatic on gluten challenge. Symptoms increased significantly in the gluten group, particularly for bloating and abdominal pain within 1 week of commencing the gluten challenge. No statistical difference was noted in serum antibody levels after gluten challenge. The authors of this study conclude that there is growing evidence that gastrointestinal symptoms in many IBS patients may be improved after gluten exclusion and differentiation between patients with IBS responsive to FODMAP restriction and those with Non-coeliac gluten sensitivity is important. This is particularly the case since evidence is emerging that a low FODMAP diet may reduce numbers of favourable bacteria in the gut (1,2). The authors went on to suggest a potential algorithm for the management of IBS patients fulfilling Rome III criteria that first implements a 6 week gluten free diet and goes on to recommend further carbohydrate restriction only in non-responders.

1. Staudacher HM, Lomer MC, Anderson JL et al. Fermentable carbohydrate restriction reduces luminal bifidobacteria and gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. J Nutr 2012; 142: 1510-1518
2. Halmos EP, Christopherson CT, Bird AR et al. Diet that differ in their FODMAP content alter the colonic luminal microenvironment. Gut 2015; 64:93-100

Resource: Nutrients June 2015; 7:4542-4554

Shahbazkhani B, Sadeghi A, Malekzadeh R et al
 
Autore:
Shahbazkhani, B; Sadeghi, A; Malekzadeh, R;
Anno:
2015 luglio
Lingue:
English;

Small Amounts of Gluten in Subjects With Suspected Nonceliac Gluten Sensitivity: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Cross-Over Trial.

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS:
There is debate over the existence of nonceliac gluten sensitivity (NCGS) intestinal and extraintestinal symptoms in response to ingestion of gluten-containing foods by people without celiac disease or wheat allergy. We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial to determine the effects of administration of low doses of gluten to subjects with suspected NCGS.

METHODS:
We enrolled 61 adults without celiac disease or a wheat allergy who believed ingestion of gluten-containing food to be the cause of their intestinal and extraintestinal symptoms. Participants were assigned randomly to groups given either 4.375 g/day gluten or rice starch (placebo) for 1 week, each via gastrosoluble capsules. After a 1-week gluten-free diet, participants crossed over to the other group. The primary outcome was the change in overall (intestinal and extraintestinal) symptoms, determined by established scoring systems, between gluten and placebo intake. A secondary outcome was the change in individual symptom scores between gluten vs placebo.

RESULTS:
According to the per-protocol analysis of data from the 59 patients who completed the trial, intake of gluten significantly increased overall symptoms compared with placebo (P = .034). Abdominal bloating (P = .040) and pain (P = .047), among the intestinal symptoms, and foggy mind (P = .019), depression (P = .020), and aphthous stomatitis (P = .025), among the extraintestinal symptoms, were significantly more severe when subjects received gluten than placebo.

CONCLUSIONS:
In a cross-over trial of subjects with suspected NCGS, the severity of overall symptoms increased significantly during 1 week of intake of small amounts of gluten, compared with placebo.

Resource: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Sep;13(9):1604-1612.

Di Sabatino A, Volta U, Salvatore C, Biancheri P, Caio G, De Giorgio R, Di Stefano M, Corazza GR.
 
Anno:
2015 aprile
Lingue:
English; Deutsch;

A Study Evaluating the Bidirectional Relationship Between Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Self-reported Non-coeliac Gluten Sensitivity.

Recent research indicates widespread use of a gluten free diet (GFD) amongst patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) with improvement of symptoms and disease course noted by the majority who embark on this dietary change. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of self-reported non-coeliac gluten sensitivity (SR-NCGS) in a cohort of British patients with IBD and conversely to determine the prevalence of IBD amongst individuals presenting with SR-NCGS. Three groups of patients attending the Royal Hallamshire Gastroenterology Clinic were enrolled in this study and asked to complete a validated questionnaire collecting demographic data and past/ current use of a gluten free diet; one group with IBD (n=145; 75 with Crohn’s disease and 70 with ulcerative colitis) and 2 control groups; one with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) diagnosed using Rome III criteria (n=59) and one group with dyspepsia, attending for endoscopy (n=109). SR-NCGS was defined as self-reported gluten sensitivity in the absence of coeliac disease. Current disease extent and severity amongst IBD patients was assessed using a validated questionnaire and medical records. Patients with IBS were the most likely to have SR-NCGS (42.4%), followed by IBD patients (27.6%) and dyspeptic patients (17.4%). 15.3% of IBS patients and 13.1% of IBD patients had tried a gluten free diet for the management of symptoms, versus just 1.8% of dyspeptic patients. The current use of a gluten free diet was recorded in 11.9% of IBS patients, 13.1% of IBD patients and 0.9% of dyspeptic patients. Diagnostic outcome data from 200 patients with SR-NCGS (in the absence of CD or wheat allergy) referred to the Royal Halllamshire between 2006 and 2013 was reviewed in order to investigate the prevalence of IBD in this group. 1.5% (n=3) of patients were found to have IBD.

No significant difference was found between patients with ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease in terms of prevalence on SR-NCGS and gluten free diet usage. However, IBD patients with SR-NCGS were significantly more likely to have stricturing disease (p=0.046) and more active disease (p=0.002) as measured by the Crohn’s Disease Activity Index score. This indicates that the presence of SR-NCGS may be a marker for clinicians of underlying severe/ structuring disease. The mechanism for the potential therapeutic effect of a gluten free diet in IBD is not well understood. The volume/ physical properties and ‘higher residue’ nature of gluten-containing foods may lead patients to avoid such products. It is also possible that an unidentified immunological mechanism may contribute to the relief experienced by patients choosing to reduce or eliminate their intake of gluten. The absence of diagnostic markers for NCGS mean it is unclear whether individuals with IBD who self-report gluten sensitivity are sensitive the gluten or other components of wheat such as mannans, amylase-trypsin inhibitors or FODMAPs. Further studies are needed to understand whether a gluten-free diet, or indeed a wider wheat free diet may be a valuable dietetic intervention in selected patients with IBD.

Resource: Inflammatory Bowel Disease 2015 Feb 24 epub ahead of print.

Aziz A, Branchi F, Pearson K, Priest J, Sanders D.
 
Anno:
2015 marzo
Lingue:
English;

What is the connection between NCGS and IBS?

Professor David Sanders
Consultant Gastroenterologist
Royal Hallamshire Hospital & the University of Sheffield
The United Kingdom

At the Expert Meeting 2014 in Salerno, Italy.
www.drschaer-institute.com